Quiz-summary
0 of 30 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
Information
CAMS Chapter 2
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 30 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 30
1. Question
Which statement holds for performing audits?
I. Audits should be properly scoped to evaluate all the defects of the program including government politicians.
II. Audits should be properly scoped to evaluate the effectiveness of the program, including foreign taxpayers.
III. Audits should not be properly scoped to evaluate the effectiveness of the program, including where external auditors are used.
IV. Audits should be properly scoped to evaluate the effectiveness of the program, including where external auditors are used.
V. Audits should be performed with the consent of Bank Officials.Correct
Audits should be properly scoped to evaluate the effectiveness of the program, including where external auditors are used.
Incorrect
Audits should be properly scoped to evaluate the effectiveness of the program, including where external auditors are used.
-
Question 2 of 30
2. Question
Identify an association of 13 global banks that aims to develop standards on money laundering controls for banks:
I. Egmont Group
II. European Union
III.GAFILAT
IV. Wolfsberg Group
V. International Monetary FundCorrect
Wolfsberg Group:
• Association of 13 global banks
• Aims to develop standards on money laundering controls for banksIncorrect
Wolfsberg Group:
• Association of 13 global banks
• Aims to develop standards on money laundering controls for banks -
Question 3 of 30
3. Question
When & where was The Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT)was created?
I. In December 2000 in Cartagena de Indias, Colombia.
II. In November 2005 in Hauge, Paris.
III.In December 2000 in Sydney, Australia.
IV. In October 2001 in London, UK.
V. In July 2000 in London, UK.Correct
The Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT), formerly known as Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering in South America (GAFISUD), was created in December 2000 in Cartagena de Indias, Colombia.
Incorrect
The Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT), formerly known as Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering in South America (GAFISUD), was created in December 2000 in Cartagena de Indias, Colombia.
-
Question 4 of 30
4. Question
When did MONEYVAL become an Associate Member of FATF?
I. In 2001
II. In 2002
III.In 2004
IV. In 2005
V. In 2006Correct
MONEYVAL became an Associate Member of FATF in 2006.
Incorrect
MONEYVAL became an Associate Member of FATF in 2006.
-
Question 5 of 30
5. Question
Select more than one answer:
Select all the members of MONEYVAL that are also Non-Members of the Council of Europe:
I.Georgia
II.Jersey
III.Isle of Man
IV.Malta
V. IsraelCorrect
MONEYVAL members include: Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Gibraltar*, Georgia, Guernsey*, Hungary, Holy See (since April 2011)*, Isle of Man*, Israel (since January 2006)*, Jersey*, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation (also a FATF member since 2003), San Marino, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Ukraine.
*Non-Members of the Council of Europe
Incorrect
MONEYVAL members include: Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Gibraltar*, Georgia, Guernsey*, Hungary, Holy See (since April 2011)*, Isle of Man*, Israel (since January 2006)*, Jersey*, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation (also a FATF member since 2003), San Marino, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Ukraine.
*Non-Members of the Council of Europe
-
Question 6 of 30
6. Question
Which statement holds for MENAFATF?
I. It is a secret agency that works for the Middle East & North African countries
II. It is a newly developed international monetary body that organizes annual sessions for framing its rules & procedures
III. It is independent of any other international organization and sets its work, rules, and procedures, which are determined by a consensus of its members
IV. It is dependent on other international organization and sets its work, rules, and procedures, which are determined by the consensus of its members
V. It is dependent on the European Union and sets its work, rules, and procedures, which are determined by the consensus of its membersCorrect
The MENAFATF is voluntary and was established by agreement between its members. It is not derived from an international treaty. It is independent of any other international organization and sets its work, rules, and procedures, which are determined by the consensus of its members.
Incorrect
The MENAFATF is voluntary and was established by agreement between its members. It is not derived from an international treaty. It is independent of any other international organization and sets its work, rules, and procedures, which are determined by the consensus of its members.
-
Question 7 of 30
7. Question
OFAC has the power to impose significant penalties on those who are:
I. Members of the European Union & found to be violating the US Patriot Act.
II. Found to be in non-violation of any criminal act.
III. Found to violate the blocking orders within each of the sanction programs.
IV. Found to violate blocking immigrants within European boundaries.
V. Found to violate the national constitution.Correct
OFAC has the power to impose significant penalties on those who are found to violate the blocking orders within each of the sanction programs.
Incorrect
OFAC has the power to impose significant penalties on those who are found to violate the blocking orders within each of the sanction programs.
-
Question 8 of 30
8. Question
Select more than one answer:
Founded in 1741, Wegelin was Switzerland’s oldest bank that specialized in:
I. Government Banking
II. Private banking
III.Asset management
IV. Money Laundering
V. Terrorist financingCorrect
Founded in 1741, Wegelin was Switzerland’s oldest bank and specialized in private banking, asset management, and other services to clients worldwide, including US taxpayers.
Incorrect
Founded in 1741, Wegelin was Switzerland’s oldest bank and specialized in private banking, asset management, and other services to clients worldwide, including US taxpayers.
-
Question 9 of 30
9. Question
Identify the most accurate fact about Wegelin Bank, Switzerland:
I. By 2012, Wegelin held approximately $ 2.5 billion in declared US taxpayer funds.
II. By 2010, Wegelin held approximately $ 1.5 billion in undeclared US taxpayer funds.
III. By 2009, Wegelin held approximately $60 billion in declared US taxpayer funds.
IV. By 2012, Wegelin held approximately $16 billion in undeclared US taxpayer funds.
V. By 2000, Wegelin held approximately $22 billion in undeclared US taxpayer funds.Correct
By 2010, Wegelin held approximately $1.5 billion in undeclared US taxpayer funds. In January 2013, after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the IRS, file false federal income tax returns, and evade federal income taxes from 2000 through 2011, the bank was sentenced to pay the United States approximately $58 million.
Incorrect
By 2010, Wegelin held approximately $1.5 billion in undeclared US taxpayer funds. In January 2013, after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the IRS, file false federal income tax returns, and evade federal income taxes from 2000 through 2011, the bank was sentenced to pay the United States approximately $58 million.
-
Question 10 of 30
10. Question
What does SUA stand for in US Criminal Money Laundering and Civil Forfeiture Laws:
I. Side effects of an unlawful association.
II. Six unauthorized associations.
III. Six unlawful activities.
IV. Specified unlawful activity.
V. Straight unlawful association.Correct
The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986, the first criminal money laundering law of the US is a powerful legal weapon that may be used if the property involved in the financial transaction at issue represents the proceeds of at least one designated underlying crime — a “specified unlawful activity” (SUA). SUAs include virtually every US crime that produces an economic advantage, including aircraft piracy, wire fraud, bank fraud, copyright infringement, embezzlement, export violations, illegal gambling, narcotics offenses, racketeering, and even some environmental crimes. (18 USC 1956 and 1957.)
Incorrect
The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986, the first criminal money laundering law of the US is a powerful legal weapon that may be used if the property involved in the financial transaction at issue represents the proceeds of at least one designated underlying crime — a “specified unlawful activity” (SUA). SUAs include virtually every US crime that produces an economic advantage, including aircraft piracy, wire fraud, bank fraud, copyright infringement, embezzlement, export violations, illegal gambling, narcotics offenses, racketeering, and even some environmental crimes. (18 USC 1956 and 1957.)
-
Question 11 of 30
11. Question
Select all the considerations that are needed to become a member of FATF:
I. Active participation in local politics.
II. Level of adherence to financial sector standards.
III. Level of adherence to private sector standards.
IV. Participation in other relevant international organizations.
V. Active participation in a FATF-Style Regional Body.Correct
To become a member of FATF, a jurisdiction must first be invited to participate as an observer. Then, the following two-step criteria must be met:
- Active participation in a FATF-Style Regional Body (FSRB) and regional prominence in AML/CFT efforts.
- Level of AML/CFT risks faced and efforts to combat those risks.
- Additional considerations
- Level of adherence to financial sector standards.
- Participation in other relevant international organizations.
Incorrect
To become a member of FATF, a jurisdiction must first be invited to participate as an observer. Then, the following two-step criteria must be met:
- Active participation in a FATF-Style Regional Body (FSRB) and regional prominence in AML/CFT efforts.
- Level of AML/CFT risks faced and efforts to combat those risks.
- Additional considerations
- Level of adherence to financial sector standards.
- Participation in other relevant international organizations.
-
Question 12 of 30
12. Question
Select TWO features of European Union Second Directive:
I. It explicitly brought bureaux de change and money remittance offices under AML coverage.
II. It did not extend the scope of the First Directive beyond drug-related crimes.
III. It extended the scope of the First Directive beyond drug-related crimes.
IV. It clarified the knowledge of employees relations in regional bodies.
V. It helped in bringing political stability in developing countries.Correct
The following were the key features of the Second Directive:
• It extended the scope of the First Directive beyond drug-related crimes. The definition of “criminal activity” was expanded to cover not just drug trafficking, but all serious crimes, including corruption and fraud against the financial interests of the European community.
• It explicitly brought bureaux de change and money remittance offices under AML coverage.
• It clarified that knowledge of criminal conduct can be inferred from objective factual circumstances.Incorrect
The following were the key features of the Second Directive:
• It extended the scope of the First Directive beyond drug-related crimes. The definition of “criminal activity” was expanded to cover not just drug trafficking, but all serious crimes, including corruption and fraud against the financial interests of the European community.
• It explicitly brought bureaux de change and money remittance offices under AML coverage.
• It clarified that knowledge of criminal conduct can be inferred from objective factual circumstances. -
Question 13 of 30
13. Question
The majority of governments around the world believe that the risk-based approach is preferable to a more prescriptive approach in the area of AML/CFT because it is more:
I. Risky but effective.
II. Not Flexible.
III. Reliable & trustworthy.
IV. Unreliable.
V. Flexible, effective & proportionate.Correct
The majority of governments around the world believe that the risk-based approach is preferable to a more prescriptive approach in the area of AML/CFT because it is more:
• Flexible—as money laundering and terrorist financing risks vary across jurisdictions, customers, products and delivery channels, and over time.
• Effective—as companies are better equipped than legislators to effectively assess and mitigate the particular money laundering and terrorist financing risks they face.
• Proportionate—because a risk-based approach promotes a common sense and intelligent approach to fighting money laundering and terrorist financing as opposed to a “check-the-box” approach. It also allows firms to minimize the adverse impact of anti-money laundering procedures on their low-risk customersIncorrect
The majority of governments around the world believe that the risk-based approach is preferable to a more prescriptive approach in the area of AML/CFT because it is more:
• Flexible—as money laundering and terrorist financing risks vary across jurisdictions, customers, products and delivery channels, and over time.
• Effective—as companies are better equipped than legislators to effectively assess and mitigate the particular money laundering and terrorist financing risks they face.
• Proportionate—because a risk-based approach promotes a common sense and intelligent approach to fighting money laundering and terrorist financing as opposed to a “check-the-box” approach. It also allows firms to minimize the adverse impact of anti-money laundering procedures on their low-risk customers -
Question 14 of 30
14. Question
The Caribbean Financial Action Task Force is a group of 27 states included in:
I. Caribbean Basin & South Asia.
II. Caribbean Basin, North and South America.
III. Caribbean Basin, Central, and South America.
IV. Caribbean Basin & Middle East.
V. Caribbean Basin, Central, and South Asia.Correct
The group consists of 27 states in the Caribbean Basin, Central, and South America that have agreed to implement common countermeasures to address the problems of money laundering, terrorist financing and the financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It was established as the result of meetings convened in Aruba in May 1990 and Jamaica in November 1992.
Incorrect
The group consists of 27 states in the Caribbean Basin, Central, and South America that have agreed to implement common countermeasures to address the problems of money laundering, terrorist financing and the financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It was established as the result of meetings convened in Aruba in May 1990 and Jamaica in November 1992.
-
Question 15 of 30
15. Question
In May 1990, representatives of Western Hemisphere countries, in particular from the Caribbean and Central America, convened in Aruba to develop:
I. A common approach to the phenomenon of the laundering of the proceeds of crime
II. A common approach to the phenomenon of drug trafficking
III. A common approach to deal with illegal immigrants
IV. A common strategy to fight life-threatening diseases
V. A common approach to developing a regional organizationCorrect
In May 1990, representatives of Western Hemisphere countries, in particular from the Caribbean and Central America, convened in Aruba to develop a common approach to the phenomenon of the laundering of the proceeds of crime.
Incorrect
In May 1990, representatives of Western Hemisphere countries, in particular from the Caribbean and Central America, convened in Aruba to develop a common approach to the phenomenon of the laundering of the proceeds of crime.
-
Question 16 of 30
16. Question
Select more than one answer
Kingston Ministerial Declaration endorsed and affirmed their respective governments to show commitment for implementation of:
I. European Union 40 Recommendations.
II. FATF and Aruba Recommendations.
III.Organization of American States (OAS) Model Regulations.
IV. 1992 United Nation Model Regulations.
V. 1988 UN Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drug.Correct
The Jamaica Ministerial Meeting was held in Kingston on November 1992. Ministers issued the Kingston Ministerial Declaration in which they endorsed and affirmed their governments’ commitment to implement the FATF and Aruba Recommendations, the Organization of American States (OAS) Model Regulations, and the 1988 UN Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances.
Incorrect
The Jamaica Ministerial Meeting was held in Kingston on November 1992. Ministers issued the Kingston Ministerial Declaration in which they endorsed and affirmed their governments’ commitment to implement the FATF and Aruba Recommendations, the Organization of American States (OAS) Model Regulations, and the 1988 UN Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances.
-
Question 17 of 30
17. Question
Select more than one answer:
Identify CFATF (Caribbean Financial Action Task Force) members among them:
I.Trinidad & Tobago
II.The British Virgin Islands
III. The Greek Islands
IV. Hong Kong & Paris
V. Dominican RepublicCorrect
CFATF members include: Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Curaçao, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Montserrat, St. Kitts & Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Maarten, St. Vincent & the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad & Tobago, Turks & Caicos Islands, and Venezuela.
Incorrect
CFATF members include: Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Curaçao, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Montserrat, St. Kitts & Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Maarten, St. Vincent & the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad & Tobago, Turks & Caicos Islands, and Venezuela.
-
Question 18 of 30
18. Question
In January 2006, GIABA revised its mandate to fully incorporate and properly reflect its fight against:
I. The poverty
II. The life-threatening disease
III. The financing of terrorism
IV. The financing of illegal immigrants
V. The economic instabilityCorrect
In January 2006, GIABA revised its mandate to fully incorporate and properly reflect its fight against the financing of terrorism.
Incorrect
In January 2006, GIABA revised its mandate to fully incorporate and properly reflect its fight against the financing of terrorism.
-
Question 19 of 30
19. Question
According to USA Patriot Act, If the funds the United States pursues are deposited in a foreign bank that keeps an “interbank account” at a US bank, the United States may bring a case to:
I. International Court of Justice
II. Forfeit the crime-tainted funds in the US account
III.United Nations General Assembly
IV. Forfeit the drug-trafficking financing in the US account
V. Regional BodiesCorrect
Section 319(a) of the USA PATRIOT Act, discussed above, greatly strengthened the forfeiture powers over the funds of foreign persons and institutions. If the funds the United States pursues are deposited in a foreign bank that keeps an “interbank account” at a US bank, the United States may bring a case to forfeit the crime-tainted funds in the US account.
Incorrect
Section 319(a) of the USA PATRIOT Act, discussed above, greatly strengthened the forfeiture powers over the funds of foreign persons and institutions. If the funds the United States pursues are deposited in a foreign bank that keeps an “interbank account” at a US bank, the United States may bring a case to forfeit the crime-tainted funds in the US account.
-
Question 20 of 30
20. Question
In April 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York seized;
I. $6.3 million held in US respondent account with American Express in New York
II. $5.3 million held in Wegelin & Co.’s US correspondent account with American Express in New York
III.$16.3 million held in Wegelin & Co.’s US correspondent account with American Express in New York
IV. $16.3 million held in Wegelin & Co.’s US correspondent account with UBS AG in Stamford
V. $14 billion held in Wegelin & Co.’s US correspondent account with UBS AG in StamfordCorrect
In April 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York seized $16.3 million held in Wegelin & Co.’s US correspondent account with UBS AG in Stamford.
Incorrect
In April 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York seized $16.3 million held in Wegelin & Co.’s US correspondent account with UBS AG in Stamford.
-
Question 21 of 30
21. Question
ROSCs is an abbreviation for:
I. Report on Observance of Signals and Codes
II. Report on Observance of Standard and Codes
III. Risk on Ordinance of Standard and Class
IV. Regional Organisation of Subclass & codes
V. Reputational Ordinance of Standard & classCorrect
“Report on Observance of Standard and Codes” (ROSCs).
Incorrect
“Report on Observance of Standard and Codes” (ROSCs).
-
Question 22 of 30
22. Question
Select more than one answer:
Identify the important documents of the European Union:
I. 1st EU Directive on the prevention of the use of Financial System for Money Laundering (1991).
II. 1st EU Directive on the prevention of the use of the Financial System for terrorist financing (1990).
III.2nd Directive (2001).
IV. 2nd Directive (2002).
V. 3rd Directive (2005).Correct
European Union Important documents:
• 1st EU Directive on Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering (1991)
• 2nd Directive (2001)
• 3rd Directive (2005)
• 4th Directive (2015)Incorrect
European Union Important documents:
• 1st EU Directive on Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering (1991)
• 2nd Directive (2001)
• 3rd Directive (2005)
• 4th Directive (2015) -
Question 23 of 30
23. Question
Select more than one answer:
IMF and the World Bank have become more active in combating money laundering by:
I. Concentrating on drug trafficking over other forms of financial abuse.
II. Concentrating on money laundering over other forms of financial abuse.
III. Helping to strengthen financial supervision and regulation in countries.
IV. Helping to weaken financial supervision & regulation in countries.
V. Insisting on the application of international AML standards in countries that ask for financial assistance.Correct
IMF and the World Bank have become more active in combating money laundering by:
• Concentrating on money laundering over other forms of financial abuse.
• Helping to strengthen financial supervision and regulation in countries.
• Insisting on the application of international AML standards in countries that ask for financial assistance.Incorrect
IMF and the World Bank have become more active in combating money laundering by:
• Concentrating on money laundering over other forms of financial abuse.
• Helping to strengthen financial supervision and regulation in countries.
• Insisting on the application of international AML standards in countries that ask for financial assistance. -
Question 24 of 30
24. Question
Select TWO things that are covered by the US Patriot Act:
I. Nationalism that outbreaks in southern American.
II. Anti-money laundering provisions affecting foreign businesses.
III. Child abuse affecting children.
IV. Terrorism financing provisions affecting foreign businesses.
V. Political instability caused due to the terrorist attacks.Correct
Key provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act stem from the premise that international access points to the US financial system must be controlled. Thus, the law covers a wide range of anti-money laundering and terrorism financing provisions affecting foreign businesses.
Incorrect
Key provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act stem from the premise that international access points to the US financial system must be controlled. Thus, the law covers a wide range of anti-money laundering and terrorism financing provisions affecting foreign businesses.
-
Question 25 of 30
25. Question
What was the policy paper called that two organizations detailed the steps to strengthen the global assault on money laundering?
I. Joining Hands to overcome Money Frauds globally.
II. Enhancing Cooperation in combating Black Money.
III. Enhancing Contributions To Combating Money Laundering.
IV. Reducing Contributions To Combating Money Laundering.
V. Join Us to combat money laundering.Correct
In an April 2000 joint policy paper called, “Enhancing Contributions To Combating Money Laundering,” the two organizations detailed the steps that they would take to strengthen the global assault on money laundering.
Incorrect
In an April 2000 joint policy paper called, “Enhancing Contributions To Combating Money Laundering,” the two organizations detailed the steps that they would take to strengthen the global assault on money laundering.
-
Question 26 of 30
26. Question
According to the Fourth EU Directive, Pecuniary sanctions for natural persons are set to at least:
I. EUR one million or 6% of the total annual turnover for entities.
II. EUR three million or 5% of the total annual turnover for entities.
III. EUR five million or 10% of the total annual turnover for entities.
IV. EUR six million or 11% of the total annual turnover for entities.
V. EUR two million or 15% of the total annual turnover for entities.Correct
About penalties for breach of the provisions, the set of administrative sanctions and measures now range from “name and shame” to the withdrawal of authorization. Pecuniary sanctions for natural persons are set to at least EUR five million or 10% of the total annual turnover for entities.
Incorrect
About penalties for breach of the provisions, the set of administrative sanctions and measures now range from “name and shame” to the withdrawal of authorization. Pecuniary sanctions for natural persons are set to at least EUR five million or 10% of the total annual turnover for entities.
-
Question 27 of 30
27. Question
Select more than one answer:
An entire section of the fourth EU directive is dedicated to the rules for:
I. Cooperation between member state FIUs & the EU commission
II. Cooperation between the United Nations & government
III. Cooperation between the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) and the EU Commission
IV. Illegal cooperation between EU & OIC
V. Proposed ideas & policies to combat criminal activitiesCorrect
An entire section of the directive is dedicated to the rules for cooperation between member state FIUs, the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) and the EU Commission.
Incorrect
An entire section of the directive is dedicated to the rules for cooperation between member state FIUs, the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) and the EU Commission.
-
Question 28 of 30
28. Question
What does the term comitology refer to in Third EU Directive?
I. It means the EU system that oversees the implementation of acts proposed by the European Commission.
II. It means the EU system that oversees the implementation of acts proposed by the Democratic Governments.
III. It means the EU system that oversees the implementation of criminal laws proposed by ICJ (International Court of Justice).
IV. It means the EU system that oversees the implementation of policy to prevent drug trafficking.
V. It means the EU system that oversees the implementation of policy to prevent child abuse.Correct
The precise role of a “comitology committee.” The European Commission coined the term “comitology,” which means the EU system that oversees the implementation of acts proposed by the European Commission.
Incorrect
The precise role of a “comitology committee.” The European Commission coined the term “comitology,” which means the EU system that oversees the implementation of acts proposed by the European Commission.
-
Question 29 of 30
29. Question
According to the third EU Directive, money laundering & terrorist financing are:
I. Extreme crimes
II. Same crimes
III. Separate crimes
IV. No crimes
V. Little offensive crimesCorrect
In line with FATF’s anti-money laundering recommendations, the Third EU Directive extended the scope of the first and second directives by:
• Defining “money laundering” and “terrorist financing” as separate crimes. The directive’s measures were expanded to cover not only the manipulation of money derived from the crime but also the collection of money or property for terrorist purposes.Incorrect
-
Question 30 of 30
30. Question
Select more than one answer
What are the different levels of AML/CFT risk categories?
I. Prohibited & High risk
II. No risk & Red zone
III. Medium & Low risk
IV. Partial Risk
V. First & last riskCorrect
AML/CFT risk categories can be broken down into the following levels:
• Prohibited—The institution will not tolerate any dealings of any kind given the risk. This category could include transactions with countries subject to economic sanctions or designated as state sponsors of terrorism, such as those on the United Nations or Office of Foreign Assets Control lists.
• High Risk — The risks here are significant, but are not necessarily prohibited. To mitigate the heightened risk presented, the financial institution should apply more stringent controls to reduce the ML/FT risk, such as conducting enhanced due diligence and more rigorous transaction monitoring. Countries that maintain a reputation for corruption or drug trafficking are generally considered high-risk. High-risk customers may include politically exposed persons (PEPs) or certain types of money services businesses or cash-intensive businesses; high-risk products and services may include correspondent banking and private banking.
• Medium Risk—Medium risks merit additional scrutiny, but do not rise to the level of high-risk. For example, a retail business that accepts low to moderate levels of cash, but is not considered cash-intensive.
• Low Risk—This represents the baseline risk of money laundering. Typically, low risk indicates normal, expected activity.Incorrect
AML/CFT risk categories can be broken down into the following levels:
• Prohibited—The institution will not tolerate any dealings of any kind given the risk. This category could include transactions with countries subject to economic sanctions or designated as state sponsors of terrorism, such as those on the United Nations or Office of Foreign Assets Control lists.
• High Risk — The risks here are significant, but are not necessarily prohibited. To mitigate the heightened risk presented, the financial institution should apply more stringent controls to reduce the ML/FT risk, such as conducting enhanced due diligence and more rigorous transaction monitoring. Countries that maintain a reputation for corruption or drug trafficking are generally considered high-risk. High-risk customers may include politically exposed persons (PEPs) or certain types of money services businesses or cash-intensive businesses; high-risk products and services may include correspondent banking and private banking.
• Medium Risk—Medium risks merit additional scrutiny, but do not rise to the level of high-risk. For example, a retail business that accepts low to moderate levels of cash, but is not considered cash-intensive.
• Low Risk—This represents the baseline risk of money laundering. Typically, low risk indicates normal, expected activity.